Blog

OTT

Pay TV

Broadcasters

June 5, 2025

Fragmentation Fatigue: Why Streaming Needs to Consolidate

By

Sebastian Braun

,

CEO at 24i

Welcome to "Streaming 2035: From Camera to Personalized Couch," a series exploring the dynamic evolution of video streaming over the next decade. In this journey, we'll delve into the forces shaping how we consume content, from the technologies powering delivery to the personalized experiences awaiting us on our couches. 

We'll examine the critical shifts we anticipate: the rise of sophisticated AI curation, the streamlining of the content supply chain, the power of unifying industry standards, and the innovative ways content will be produced and monetized.

But before we can envision this future, we must confront the present reality: a landscape increasingly defined by fragmentation fatigue.

What is fragmentation fatigue?

Remember the promise of streaming? A vast library of content, readily available on any device, often at a lower cost than traditional cable. For a while, it delivered. We gleefully cut the cord, embracing the freedom to choose exactly what we wanted to watch, when we wanted to watch it.

Fast forward to today, and the picture is considerably more complex. The initial wave of a few dominant players has fractured into a sprawling sea of services, each vying for our attention and, more importantly, our subscription dollars and consumption data. We juggle multiple accounts, each with its own exclusive content, its own interface, and its own monthly fee or ad monetization. 

Finding that specific show everyone is talking about often involves a frustrating search across several platforms, or in the case of shorter-form content, fruitlessly searching a social media feed to find that one video clip that caught your eye and you forgot to bookmark.  This isn't the liberating future we were promised. Instead, what we face is:

  • Subscription overload: The cost of subscribing to multiple "must-have" services can quickly exceed the price of the very cable packages we sought to escape.
  • Content disparity: The content we desire is often locked behind individual platform paywalls or spread out among different ad-supported services, forcing us to subscribe to services for just one or two specific shows or navigate between multiple offerings to get what we want, including short-form content on various social media sites.
  • Discovery deficit: With an overwhelming abundance of content spread across numerous platforms, the joy of discovery has been replaced by the arduous task of endless scrolling and searching. We spend more time looking for something to watch than actually watching it.
  • App fatigue: Navigating a multitude of different apps, each with its own unique user experience, adds another layer of friction to our entertainment consumption.

This fragmentation doesn't just frustrate viewers; it presents significant challenges for the entire industry.

For content creators

The fractured landscape can complicate distribution and reduce overall reach. Negotiating deals with numerous platforms, each with its own terms and technological requirements, adds complexity and cost. Smaller, niche content providers often struggle to gain visibility amidst the marketing behemoths of larger platforms.

For streaming platforms

The intense competition for subscribers leads to escalating content acquisition costs and marketing spend. Retaining subscribers becomes a constant battle, forcing platforms to continuously invest in new exclusive content, further fueling the fragmentation cycle.

For technology providers

The lack of standardization across platforms necessitates the development and maintenance of a wide array of technologies and integrations, increasing complexity and potentially hindering innovation.

The case for consolidation

Imagine a future where accessing your favorite content is less of a logistical puzzle. Consolidation, in a thoughtful and strategic manner, offers a path towards a more streamlined and beneficial ecosystem for everyone:

  • Enhanced user experience: A smaller number of robust platforms, potentially offering bundled content or easier cross-platform access, would simplify discovery and reduce subscription fatigue. Imagine a unified search across a curated selection of top-tier content.
  • Greater content accessibility: Consolidation could lead to a more centralized marketplace for content, potentially making a wider variety of shows and movies available through fewer subscriptions.
  • Sustainable business models: A more consolidated market could foster more stable and sustainable business models for streaming platforms, potentially leading to more reasonable subscription prices in the long run.
  • Increased efficiency and innovation: Standardization and reduced complexity in the underlying infrastructure could free up resources for greater innovation in areas like personalization, streaming quality, and interactive experiences.
  • Better opportunities for niche content: In a more consolidated environment with robust discovery tools, high-quality niche content could potentially find larger and more targeted audiences.

The current fragmented state of streaming, while initially offering choice, has inadvertently created a complex and often frustrating experience. As we move forward in this series, we will explore how the natural forces of market evolution, coupled with technological advancements, are likely to drive a significant wave of consolidation in the coming years. 

This isn't about returning to the limitations of traditional broadcast but about forging a future where a more unified and intelligent ecosystem delivers on the original promise of streaming—vast content, easily accessible, and tailored to your individual preferences.

Join us next time as we delve deeper into the potential models of consolidation and what the landscape of streaming might look like in the not-so-distant future.

You Might Also Like

See What We’re Up To